Leadership Technology in the Context of Society Informatization
Galina Ivanovna Avtsinova1, Margarita Anatolyevna Ganyushina2, Milada Mikhailovna Istomina3
1Galina Ivanovna Avtsinova, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia.
2Margarita Anatolyevna Ganyushina, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia.
3Milada Mikhailovna Istomina, International Institute of Economics and Law, Moscow, Russia.
Manuscript received on 24 August 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on 09 September 2019. | Manuscript published on 30 September 2019. | PP: 2484-2488 | Volume-8 Issue-11, September 2019. | Retrieval Number: K17260981119/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.K1726.0981119
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: The purpose of this article is improving leadership technology in the context of society informatization. Theoretical and methodological basis of the study includes an abstract-logical method, methods of induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, and systematization, used to substantiate the socio-economic aspects of leadership, as well as graphics methods to study the leadership development level and trends in the context of society informatization. Studies indicate that there are significant differences in the satisfaction level between staff members and managing business leaders holding executive position, i.e. in cases, where the roles of business leader and executive were performed by a single person, as well as staff members with subordinating business leaders, i.e. in cases, where the roles of business leader and executive were performed by different persons. While for staff member teams with business leaders holding executive positions, the average satisfaction score is 3.929, i.e. is very close to satisfactory, for teams with subordinating business leaders, the average satisfaction score is equal to 2.807, i.e. remains within the nonsatisfactory gradation. Additional facts in favor of the proposed hypothesis consist in a fact that in the teams, where executives lead in the business sector not only on the aspects of business leadership in general, having the highest total score, but also for each of aspects individually, the satisfaction indicators are the highest in the sample, equal to four or more points. At the same time, the least satisfaction was noted in the teams, where executives had a relatively low business status. The study has revealed that leadership in the future can be a stimulus for communication, activity, and formation of certain interpersonal relations in the context of society informatization.
Keywords: Leadership, Phenomenon, Management, Personality, Society, Group, Executive, Organization, Needs.
Scope of the Article: Context Awareness and Personalization, Autonomic and Trusted Computing