Comparision of Seismic Analysis of a Residential Structure Between Normal Rcc, Shear Wall Columns
T.G. N.C.Vamsi Krishna1, S.V. Surendhar2, Mirza Mahaboob Baig3, Atif Zakaria4
1T.G. N.C.Vamsi Krishna, UG Civil Engineering, From JNTUK and Pursuing Post Graduation Structural Engineering in VFSTR University, Vadlamudi, Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), India.
2S. V. Surendhar, Asst. Professor, in VFSTR University, Vadlamudi, Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), India.
3Mirza Mahaboob Baig, UG Civil Engineering, From JNTUK and Pursuing Post Graduation Structural Engineering in VFSTR University, Vadlamudi, Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), India.
4Atif Zakaria, UG Civil Engineering From, OIU Khartoum, Sudan and Pursuing Post Graduation Structural Engineering in VFSTR University, Vadlamudi, Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), India.
Manuscript received on 01 May 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 15 May 2019 | Manuscript published on 30 May 2019 | PP: 1987-1992 | Volume-8 Issue-7, May 2019 | Retrieval Number: G5990058719/19©BEIESP
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: In high raised structures, mostly columns are preferred with either Normal RCC Columns or Steel Columns. In India, most probably RCC columns only used because it depends on the availability of materials, workmanship and RCC Columns occupies more space in high raised structures due to the large dimensions but it controls the large deflections of the structure due to an earthquake. Steel Columns occupied less space and it can also give more strength than RCC Columns but the availability of material is less because steel consumption in India very low compared with other foreign countries and due to the earthquake large deformations occurred in steel columns. For controlling or eliminating these problems shear wall columns are better in High Raised Structures. Shear wall columns stronger than the RCC Columns, it can increase usable floor area in the structure and also it can decrease the deflections than the RCC Columns. Considered a geometrical irregularity of residential structure (G+18 Storey) in the seismic zone-III, Medium type of soil condition. Analyse the structure with Linear and Non-linear Dynamic analysis in various types of columns they are Normal RCC, Shear wall Columns by ETAB Software. Due to an analysis of these structures compare the Storey displacements, Storey drifts, Base shears, Response Spectrum curve, Time History curve, Self-weight, Time period of the structure. From these above parameters conclude that shear wall type of columns most suitable in all possible conditions.
Keyword: RCC Columns, Shear Wall Columns, Deflections, Self-weight, Time Period of the Structure.
Scope of the Article: Concrete Structures.