Characteristics of Rectangular Section and Double Hat Section
S. Kalyanakumar1, L. Prabhu2, Vineeth. PC3, Abhijeeth MP4, Abhishek G5
1S. Kalyanakumar, Department of Mechanical, AarupadaiVeedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Deemed To Be University, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
2L. Prabhu, Department of Mechanical, AarupadaiVeedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Deemed To Be University, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
3Vineeth. PC, Department of Mechanical, AarupadaiVeedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Deemed To Be University, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
4Abhijeeth MP, Department of Mechanical, AarupadaiVeedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Deemed To Be University, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
5Abhishek G, Department of Mechanical, AarupadaiVeedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Deemed To Be University, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
Manuscript received on 08 November 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 16 December 2019 | Manuscript Published on 31 December 2019 | PP: 457-460 | Volume-9 Issue-2S4 December 2019 | Retrieval Number: B12121292S419/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B1212.1292S419
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open-access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: This proposal defines the difference between the double hat section tubes &rectangular section for tremble energy consumption like in crash worth applications. The primary objective of this study is to “to gather information regarding the energy absorption & impact of double and single cap section tubes and to apply them in the system where energy absorption takes place. The double-hat and thin-walled top-hat in which spot-welded by quasi-static axial method. Many tests were identified such as associated energy-absorbing characteristics and several post-test collapse mode where scrutinized and compared with other previous tests. The best model was selected by crush analysis in universal testing machine by comparison of parameters such as mean force and energy absorbers. The efficient model is selected by comparatively lesser mean force and higher energy absorption.
Keywords: Hat Section, Crash.
Scope of the Article: Mechanical Maintenance